Geographical Psyche? Does your location shape you?


Is “Mid-west Nice” an empty stereotype? What about “southern hospitality? Are people in the Northeast more neurotic than those in the West?

The most recently published American Psychologist (v. 65:6) has a couple of articles on the topic of geography and psychology that pique my interest and may give us some clues to the relationship between location and personality.

Nansook Park and Christopher Peterson (U Mich) look at regional variation in character strengths of cities say the following,

“The place where we grew up or currently reside is more than physical space. It defines who we are, how we think about ourselves and others, and the way we live.” (p. 535)

The authors used an Internet-based “self-report of character strengths” measuring 24 different strengths. These strengths are loosely lumped into two general categories, head strengths and heart strengths. By this they mean those that are more individualistic and intellectual vs. those that are more emotional and interpersonal.

Interestingly, the cities with the highest “head” strengths were LA, San Francisco, and Oakland and those with the lowest “head” orientation were Arlington, TX, OK City, and Omaha, NB [NOTE: this is a very large convenience sample, not a representative sample]. Those with the highest “heart” orientation were El Paso, TX, Mesa, AZ, and Miami. Lowest “heart” cities were Seattle, San Francisco, and Boston.

Then the authors correlated head and heart cities with 2008 presidential voting data. Head cities correlated with voting for Obama (.44) while heart cities correlated with votes for McCain (.46). These correlations are not huge but significant.

So, it may be that where you live influences the development of head or heart. Or maybe we tend to migrate to like-minded/hearted people. Also, the media in these cities have ways of influencing what we know and feel. Having lived near Philadelphia and Chicago, I can attest to the influence of the nightly news. Though Chicago is a larger city, the evening news was nowhere the crime/body count I watch in Philadelphia.

The second article explores, “Statewide Differences in Personality” (Peter Rentfrow, author). Rentfrow wants to give evidence that our stereotypes (e.g., “New Yorkers are outspoken, neurotic, and always in a hurry”) have a basis in reality. 3 different studies (1973, 2002, and 2008) reveal “surprisingly consistent geographical patterns for Neuroticism and Openness”

Neuroticism tends to be high in the Northeast and Southeast and low in the Midwest and West….Openness tends to be high in the New England, Middle Atlantic, and Pacific regions and comparatively lower in the Great Plains, Midwest, and Southeastern States.” (p. 549) [Openness, by the way, does not mean “nice” but openness to new ideas, change, etc.]

Rentfrow wonders what might account for these differences. Do people migrate to areas where others also have their same traits? Is it more the result of social influence? Or, is it the result of ecological influences (e.g., environmental or infectious disease load influencing disposition)?

He concludes with considerations of the impact of personality differences in regions. It matters because of consequences to social connectedness, political power, and overall health.

So, what do you think? How much does the region you live (or were raised in) influence your demeanor, personality, etc?

3 Comments

Filed under Psychology

Prayers for the Maier family


Those of you familiar with my program at Biblical Seminary know that my dear colleague and his wife, Bryan  and Michelle Maier, have been battling her breast cancer for the last 3 plus years. Tuesday morning, the Lord called Michelle home. Please remember Bryan and his three young boys as they grieve the loss of their wife and mother.

If you have known Michelle, then you know she has been a fighter, turning back death numerous times over the last 9 months. But more than that, she was the drive and the organization behind Bryan. She made it easier for him to be the excellent but sometimes absent-minded professor that he is. When I saw them together, it was absolutely clear that she loved him but didn’t take him (or herself) too seriously. This means she knew Bryan well, his strengths and weaknesses, and cared for both equally well. She was one who knew how to speak the truth in love.

In her own right, she was an exceptional teacher with much experience in teaching learning and behavior disordered children. Even after coming to Philadelphia, she taught courses for teachers in training back in  Chicago.

I first met Bryan and Michelle at Wheaton College in 1995, before either of us had children. I have watched Michelle in times of strength and times of weaknesses. No matter the context, whether she was chasing down a toddler or lying in a bed trying to breathe, I always felt there was something very solid about her, about her faith, and her commitment to her family.

So, pray for the family. Bryan wishes to grieve well and to help his boys grieve do the same. There will be a viewing at the Huff and Lakjer Funeral Home in Lansdale, PA on Tuesday, 9/21 from 7-9 pm. The funeral will be held at First Baptist Church, Lansdale on 9/22 at 10:30 am. Graveside service afterward and reception to follow. Bryan has asked that those considering sending flowers to instead contribute to the future educational needs of his boys instead. I’ll post details about how to do that here as a comment when I have them.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

The journey is the point?


This past weekend our family went camping at Blue Rocks Family Campground. One of the reasons we picked this place was because it allowed us to hike from our tent site up onto the Appalachian Trail and to a vista labeled Pulpit Rock. The map showed that the hike was approximately 1.5 miles to the top of a 1500 foot picturesque bump. The first 100 yards was rather fun. But this part of Pennsylvania is rocky, make that extremely rocky. In fact, it is so rocky that you cannot take a step without stepping on or over blue rocks. A step onto a flat spot is quite rare. I have heard from hikers that this part of the Appalachian Trail is the hardest of the entire length of the AT.

However, we had a clear blue sky, perfect temperature, and the promise of a great view from the vista. While strenuous due the steepness and the rocks we arrived at the “summit” in good time enjoying the quiet peacefulness of the woods. When we stepped toward the overlook, we were shocked to see a crowd of people waiting their turn to get a good look from the edge. Some of the waiting were hardy hikers carrying packs, tents, and sleeping bags. But others were dressed in clothes not best suited for hiking.

Turning to my left, I noticed a parking lot off through the trees. Ah, so we didn’t need to hike to see the vista after all. We could have driven up and gotten the same view without the effort. For a moment I felt robbed. Not so much because I wished we would have driven up to the vista but because my labors had to be shared with those who came up with ease. But then I realized I didn’t really come for the vista alone but for the good feeling and the experience of hiking up a trail, of being in silence (as much as you can with 3 hyperactive boys in tow), and surrounded by woods and rocks.

While those who drove up have their brief memories of the vista, I get to enjoy the hike even today every time I walk up or down stairs since my knees send me their complaints.

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Coming to Peace with Psychology 2


In chapter 3 and 4 of his Coming to Peace with Psychology (IVP, 2010), Everett Worthington continues to show us how we are not near as good at intuiting facts as they really are. We us heuristics (rules of thumb). Hidden factors influence our views, ideas, experiences, and behaviors. In chapter 3 he gives an example of clinical judgment about trauma vs. research data. He suggests that most clinicians believe that the vast majority of survivors of traumatic experiences will have some form of PTSD. In contrast to this assumption, George Bonanno provides research data suggesting that some 10-30 percent of trauma survivors have chronic problems. Another 5-10 percent have delayed problems. However, the rest recover quickly or are resilient altogether. His point? Clinicians think resiliency in the face of trauma is rare when in fact it is quite common.

I find this example a bit strange. He did not cite sources pointing to the fact that clinicians assume PTSD in most survivors. I would have expected that he, a scientist, would have done that. Most therapists I know don’t go fishing for PTSD when no symptoms exist.

I think his deeper point still stands. We humans believe what we believe in the face of inconsistent data. So, he wants to explore what more objective research about human behavior might give us in our quest for consider the relationship between psychological science (not psychotherapy) and Christianity.

These first 4 chapters appear to be Worthington’s efforts to make sure we recognize that empirical research can teach us much about human nature; that research is going to be useful in building a model relationship between psychology and Christianity. Good for him! Let’s see how he begins to deal with the disciplines of psychology and theology in the next chapters.

Leave a comment

Filed under biblical counseling, christian counseling, christian psychology, Christianity, Psychology

Live Your Calling Discovery Group Starting Soon


Looking for career helps? Linda Channing (grad of our MA Counseling program at Biblical Seminary) is running a Live Your Calling discovery group on Tuesdays (7-9p) starting on September 28, 2010. If you are in the area and looking for some help with career decisions or moving from idea to action, you may find this space-limited group a use for you. It meets at New Life Presbyterian Church for 8 consecutive weeks. Attendance is mandatory for all eight sessions. Group members take the MBTI and the Strong Interest Inventory as part of the assessment. Cost is $75 for the whole group, the tests, and the group book.

For more info, contact Linda at Linda@channingcoaching.com or by phone at 215.642.0085

Leave a comment

Filed under christian counseling, counseling

Coming to Peace with Psychology 1


In the first chapter of Coming to Peace with Psychology: What Christians can Learn from Psychological Science (IVP, 2010) Ev Worthington makes this point: We’re not as good at predicting human behavior as we would like to think. Science can help us. Or, the flip side, we are really great at formulating post hoc explanations (after we read scientific data) that help us think that we knew it all along (p. 28). You know, like when you get the answer of some piece of trivia, you feel you knew it all along. He provides several examples of surprising data that prove that we aren’t that good at predicting human behavior. Why is this important? We humans need help understanding our world. We don’t always make good choices even though we have massive data about humanity (biblical, experiential, etc.). So, he asks at the end of chapter one, how does psychological science relate to theology given that theology looks not to “thin slices” of large amounts of data but to Scripture?

In chapter two, Ev shows how his approach to the scripture/science relationship differs from previous attempts. He starts with the origin of the debate, makes an allusion to the Renaissance but quickly turns to the issue of counseling because it is in counseling where Christians are most concerned about whether they are receiving godly or ungodly wisdom. He points to usual suspects: secular models, rejection of Christian worldview, especially in academia, rejection of traditions and authorities. These cultural phenomena lead many Christians to be wary of liberal, free-wheeling, therapists. The call for “Christian counseling that was centered on biblically consistent beliefs and values was answered by Christians trying to integrate current counseling theories with Reformed theologies.

While there are variations on this theme, Worthington thinks one belief ties them together: Scripture and our human interpretations of it provide a clearer picture of reality than do human attempts to read general revelation. And, those disciplines that cover the nature of person (vs. “harder” sciences) have more distortion to them. Thus, there is a need to develop Christian filters to get rid of distortions in psychology.

He then singles out a few individuals who have diverse but generally favorable takes on the filter model: Robert C. Roberts, Eric Johnson, and David Powlison. Each has a different take on the problem of psychology and theology but all agree that there needs to be some critical evaluation of the underpinnings of psychological science. Interestingly, he dismisses each view (gently) for not being able to survive mainstream psychology.

Following these three, he points to three scientists who happen to be Christian: Malcolm Jeeves, David Myers, and Fraser Watts. Each, says Worthington, uses some form of a perspectivalist approach: two disciplines looking at overlapping data from different points of view (and asking different questions).

He ends the chapter saying that psychological science (Not psychotherapy) can be the bridge between science and theology–though I’m not sure he has spelled that out yet. Further, instead of just making Scripture trump (filter model) or Psychological research trump (Myer’s approach), we need a longer dialog when there seems to be conflict between Scripture and psychology.

He will take up “who do we trust during a conflict” in the next chapter.

Some thoughts. For those looking for deeper philosophy of science dialogue, you will need to look elsewhere. This is not Worthington’s focus. Rather, he wishes to give scientific endeavors some room at the table so that it can be taken seriously. To do so, he needs to show how both the filter and the separate-but-equal approaches miss the mark.

Leave a comment

Filed under biblical counseling, christian counseling, christian psychology, Christianity, counseling, counseling science, Psychology, Uncategorized

Best ice-cream ever!


As a last hurrah of summer, my family went to Lancaster to see the Joseph production at the Sight and Sound Theater. Good show. But even better was the ice-cream at Lapp Valley Farm, New Holland, PA. This is a Amish/Mennonite farm (not sure which) with little fanfare but fabulous ice-cream. If you are ever out that way, use Google maps and you can find them!

2 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

Coming to Peace with Psychology I (Review)


I’ve arrived as a blogger! No, I’m not getting paid to write and I’m not getting millions of hits each day. But I am getting a new perk. Someone has seen fit to send me complimentary books just in case I might wish to review them here. Free books! Do you know how cool that is? To an academic and book lover, it is just about the best perk ever.

[I guess this is a good time for a disclaimer. I only review books I find interesting. And even if the book comes wrapped in Ben Franklins (this one wasn’t for some reason), I promise to tell you what I really feel about the book]

Today, I received Ev Worthington’s new book, Coming to Peace with Psychology: What Christians Can Learn From Psychological Science (IVP, 2010). You may be familiar with Dr. Worthington’s work on marriage enrichment, marriage and family therapy, and forgiveness. This is my first experience with him writing about the relationship of psychology and Christianity. Here are a few of his thoughts from the introduction and the enclosed “Author Q & A” about why we might need a new book on this topic:

  • “In this book I will claim that we can know people better, and even know God better, by heeding psychological science.” (p. 11)
  • “People have been integrating theology and psychology for years, but a vast majority of the integration has come from psychotherapists. Only a small minority of integrators have been psychological scientists…. While psychotherapists try to generalize about human nature on the basis of the clients they have seen and the models of helping they were trained in, psychological scientists measure the whole range of people–those 15 percent who were clients with some psychotherapist and about 85 percent more who are not.” (Author Q & A)

Wow. He lays down the gauntlet. The problem with previous integration has been the emphasis on anecdotes from therapists. If only we had more integration models by scientists. In fact, he is right–to a degree. Much of integration is highly theory driven. But is that bad?

[Rabbit trail: What are the common “sins” of theologian integrators? Clinician Integrators? Research Integrators? Theologians put far too much emphasis on their constructs and exegesis; clinicians put too much emphasis on “what works”; researchers put too much confidence in p values. In fact none have the corner on the market of truth. But again, Worthington’s book may be very helpful. He is right that both clinicians and biblical counselors fail to interact deeply enough with psychological research. Either they dismiss scientific methods by pointing out its weaknesses or they generalize from a small data point into a grand theory even though the data cannot bear the weight of the theory.]

Let’s hear some more from Worthington about the direction of his book:

  • His theses: Psychological science helps both Christians and non-Christians (a) understand God’s creation in human beings, (b) know about God more because the study of image bearers points to God, and (c) live more virtuously. (p. 13)
  • So, he sees psychology as a common grace to refine us all. This is very interesting. Usually integrative literature has cited common grace as what allows humans to rightly perceive. Here, the discipline IS common grace.
  • The relationship between psychology and Christianity is an “emerging marriage”– one that has possibilities of conflict and yet greater intimacy.

Finally, you might be interested in just what approach Ev Worthington will take in connecting psychology and Christianity. In the past some have described integration as a recycling project, a filter to get rid of non-Christian worldviews, a recasting effort, or a perspectival or level of explanation project. He mentions two: filter and perspectival approaches. The filter tries to have theological/biblical constructs as interpreting science. He finds this problematic. The perspectival model tries to separate the two disciplines as different ways of knowing.

So what does Worthington suggest? A new model he calls a relational approach.

That’s enough for this post. Next post I’ll make some comments on his first section (where he addresses some of the problems in previous integration by pointing to some psychological science).

4 Comments

Filed under biblical counseling, christian psychology, counseling, counseling science, philosophy of science, Psychology

When is residential treatment an option for you or someone you love?


Harvest USA, a local Philadelphia ministry,  is just about ready to unveil a new booklet that will be available for purchase via download. I wrote this last year after trying to help someone consider whether or not residential care was necessary to address an ongoing battle with sexual addiction.  They sent me an advance hard copy to preview and so I’ve included a pic of the front page on this post. Sorry, I couldn’t provide a better, color shot.

As you might expect, when a sexual addiction is discovered, confusion reigns among the addict and the family. What should they do? What does it mean? Where can he/she go to get help? Strong emotions and the nature of the crisis may lead to quick decisions. Whereas one family wants to find the best, most intensive solution, another family may try to solve the problem “in-house” with accountability from the pastor.

This is a short booklet designed to help the reader cut through some of the confusion and answer 8 key questions to help them decide whether it is necessary to seek treatment in a residency setting. The booklet concludes with a list of books and short-term and residential programs around the country.

I’ll let you know when the e-version is available for download.

3 Comments

Filed under christian counseling, christian psychology, counseling

Deadly Sins of Professors?


Okay, since I made note of the sins of students, it is only fair to admit the sins of the teacher. But with so many, where to start?

1. Pride. Pontification is an easy sin. We want to be seen as wise and so we use our bully pulpit to “educate” even if we don’t have a clue what we are saying

2. Laziness. Using the same material each year and expecting it to be fresh and valuable as the day it was thought up

3. Defensiveness. Every critical statement made by students isn’t the result of their psychopathology. We screw up and ought to be able to admit it

4. Jealousy. We tear down our more prolific/famous colleagues because it makes us feel less of a failure.

Others teacher sins you can think of? Be gentle 🙂

1 Comment

Filed under education