JesusCreed on “Ex-Gays”


Starting on 10/2 Scot McKnight is going to start a post series at www.jesuscreed.orgon Stan Jones and Mark Yarhouse’s new book, Ex-Gays? Yesterday, he merely announced that he would start the series and it brought on the usual discussions that one encounters when talking about homosexuality, sexual orientation, etc. (e.g., is it right/wrong? Did Jesus say anything about the matter? What is orientation? Does it really change? Why do we give special attention to this particular activity and avoid things like gossip and adultery?). All good questions, but they may miss the actual issues raised by this particular book.

Personal experiences play a huge role in much of the public conversation about sexuality (we all have broken sexual experiences and friends and family with their own experiences). It will be interesting to see whether readers of JesusCreed will be able to consider the merits of the questions that Jones and Yarhouse ask: Is it ever possible for someone to change their sexual orientation using religious means? And, is it harmful to try?

Chapter one lays out the controversy (i.e., the scientific and political claims in the debate, whether sexual orientation is a thing or a construction) and articulates their view of the relationship between science and faith.

Chapter two provides an overview of a Christian/biblical view of sexuality (what it was designed to be and how it is broken). In short, they report that the biblical text gives sexual intercourse a fixed meaning (an good act between husband and wife) rather than have the act defined by the intent of the participants. “Nonreligious persons today are accustomed to thinking that the meaning of their sexual actions are conferred by their intentions for those acts….But the Christian tradition asserts the opposite: that sexually intimate acts have fixed meanings by their very nature” (p. 49).  God provides the boundaries, but given our fallen nature, every aspect of our personhood reflects humanity’s rebellion against God. They then detail both Christian ethical responses to homosexuality as well as pastoral responses by well-known agencies.

Chapters 3 and 4 are the defense of their rationale and methodologies. Of note is the small sample size. But remember, they want to know whether it is ever possible for someone to change orientation through religious means. They do an interesting discussion of what kind of study they wanted to do and what they actually did in the end (chapter five) and why. They also address matters of researcher bias here. Chapters 6-9 explore how one might measure sexual orientation change and report their results.

Whether you agree or disagree with their sexual ethic, agree or disagree with their interpretation of orientation or their view of what makes for a robust empirical finding, you ought to agree that this is a well-written book that attempts to very slowly walk through the issues (scientific, biases, change, identity and orientation) without slandering opponents and yet maintaining their apologetical stance.

A worthy book to read by anyone. Stay tuned to JesusCreed to see how readers there respond to the issues when it gets to the details of the chapters.   

2 Comments

Filed under counseling science, Identity, sexual identity

2 responses to “JesusCreed on “Ex-Gays”

  1. jos76

    As a legally married, Christian, gay man, I am interested in the findings…yet sceptical of course.
    Jos76
    http://www.jos76.wordpress.com

  2. A few years ago I did a lengthy research paper regarding perspectives on why homosexuality was removed from the DSM, and the various viewpoints on reparative therapy. What I found interesting was that the very clinician who more or less lead the juggernaut charge to expunge homosexuality from the DSM in 1973, Dr. Robert L. Spitzer, thirty years later decided to do some anecdotal research with “ex-gays” who had gone through reparative therapy, to query them concerning how successful they felt it was. Dr. Spitzer published a paper in the 10/2003 edition of “Archives of Sexual Behavior”, after he’d performed interviews with approximately 200 persons who had identified themselves as once practicing homosexual behavior, and also having gone through reparative therapy for a minimum of five (5) years. Throckmorton and Welton examined Spitzer’s results (“Counseling practices as they relate to ratings of helpfulness by consumers of sexual reorientation therapy” Journal of Psychology and Christianity, Vol. 24, No. 4, pgs. 332-342) and reported reported that Spitzer had concluded from his interviewing that reparative or “re-orientation” therapy was indeed helpful and efficacious for enabling a homosexual person to live and thrive personally as a heterosexual. Spitzer found that 67% of his interviewees were, at the time of the interview, experiencing what he considered “good heterosexual functioning.” Now, detractors pointed to the 33% who did not experience this success as evidence that the therapy was ineffective. Spitzer, countering this, commented in an interview with Christianity Today magazine, “But suppose you found that 5 percent 10 percent did switch back (referring to criticisms about likely recidivism). I mean, so what? You’d find the same thing if you followed people who had treatment for drug addiction. Some are going to relapse” (“Therapeutically incorrect: Atheist psychiatrist argues that gays can change”. Christianity Today, April 2005). While the APA and the ACA have strongly come down on the side of opposition of reparative therapy, organizations like the AACC, NARTH and Society for Christian Psychology are steadily building a body of research to bolster claims that counter the heavily biased secular perspective. I find this most encouraging.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.