“Pay-to-Play” isn’t a crime?


Anybody remotely aware of Philadelphia politics knows that the John Street administration and friends have been hammered by the feds investigating their pay-to- play style of doing business with city officials: “you line my pockets and I’ll make sure you get the contract to do work.” It’s not a new phenomena in politics. Just ask the former mayor of Providence (who I believe has done jail time for similar antics.

Well, the Red Sox just won the right to talk to a Japanese baseball team about purchasing one of their great pitchers. How did they win the right? They will pay over 51 MILLION dollars just to negotiate a deal (some suggest it will be another 12 mill per year to actually pay him to be on the team). Now if that isn’t the biggest pay-to-play crime, I don’t know what is.

What happens if this player turns out to be a bust? Blows his arm out next year?

Disgusting. But, I’m sure you’ll find me “forgetting” this come next October when they are in the postseason…

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

One response to ““Pay-to-Play” isn’t a crime?

  1. Obviously they overpaid. But… in this instance that is the legal process worked out between the leagues. Not quite the legal process in Philly, or Providence.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.